Abstract

This paper presents the experimental results and analytical modeling of the axial compressive behavior of concrete cylinders confined by both glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) tube and inner steel spiral reinforcement (SR). The concrete structure is termed as GFRP–SR confined concrete. The number of GFRP layers (1, 2, and 3 layers) and volumetric ratios of SR (1.5% and 3%) were the experimental variables. Test results indicate that both GFRP tube and SR confinement remarkably increase the ultimate compressive strength, energy dissipation capacity, and ductility of concrete. The volumetric ratio of SR has a more pronounced influence on the energy dissipation capacity of confined concrete with more GFRP layers. In addition, a stress–strain model is presented to predict the axial compressive behavior of GFRP–SR confined concrete. Comparisons between the analytical results obtained using the proposed model and experimental results are also presented.

Highlights

  • In the last two decades, the use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites has drawn much attention in civil engineering

  • The failure process was quiet because of a relatively gradual rupture of the glass FRP (GFRP) tube, unlike the explosive process observed in carbon FRP (CFRP) confined concrete cylinders

  • Significant increase in strength and ductility of concrete can be achieved by using GFRP tubes and spiral reinforcement (SR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last two decades, the use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites has drawn much attention in civil engineering. Research efforts have been directed towards the applications of FRP in new column constructions; concrete-filled FRP tubes (CFFTs) have been used as high-performance composite columns in construction of earthquake-resistant structures [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These studies showed that the stress–strain curve of well-confined concrete with FRP is characterized by two ascending branches with increasing ultimate concrete compressive strength and strain. Based on the experimental results, a design-oriented confinement stress–strain model was developed

Test Matrix
Fabrication of Specimens
FRP Composites
Ductility Index and Energy Consideration for Ductility Index at Failure
Test Instrumentation
Failure Modes
Axial Stress–Strain Relationships
Ultimate Condition
Influence of Experiment Variables
Numbers of FRP Layers
Axial-Transverse Strain Responses
Analytical Modeling for Concrete Confined with Both GFRP Tubes and SR under
Proposed Stress Equations
Proposed Stress–Strain Model for FRP–SR Confined Concrete in Compression
Comparison of the Model Proposed with the Experimental Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call