Compression Characteristics of Non-Treated and Steam-exploded Barley, Canola, Oat, and Wheat Straw Grinds

Abstract

Compaction of low bulk density agricultural biomass is a critical and desirable operation for sustainable and economic availability of feedstock for biofuel industry.A comprehensive study of the compression characteristics (density of pellet and total specific energy required for compression) of ground non-treated and steam-exploded barley, canola, oat, and wheat straw obtained from three hammer mill screen sizes of 6.4, 3.2 and 1.6 mm at 10% moisture content (wb) was conducted. Four preset pressures of 31.6, 63.2, 94.7, and 138.9 MPa were applied using an Instron testing machine to compress samples in a cylindrical die. Ground steam-exploded barley straw at screen sizes of either 3.2 or 1.6 mm produced high density compacts, while ground steam-exploded canola, oat, and wheat straw at screen sizes of 6.4, 3.2 or 1.6 mm produced high density compacts. Steam-exploded barley straw for 3.2 mm at 138.9 MPa produced compacts having 13% higher density and consumed 19% lower total specific energy compared to non-treated straw. Steam-exploded canola straw for 1.6 mm at 138.9 MPa produced compacts having 13% higher density and consumed 22% higher total specific energy compared to non-treated straw. Steam-exploded oat straw for 3.2 mm at 94.7 MPa produced compacts having 19% higher density and consumed 13% higher total specific energy compared to non-treated straw. Steam-exploded wheat straw for 6.4 mm at 138.9 MPa produced compacts having 17% higher density and consumed 17% higher total specific energy compared to non-treated straw. Three compression models, namely: Jones model, Cooper-Eaton model, and Kawakita-Ludde model were considered to determine the pressure-volume and pressure-density relationship of non-treated and steam-exploded straws. Kawakita-Ludde model provided the best fit to the experimental data having R2 values of 0.99 for non-treated straw and 1.00 for steam-exploded biomass samples. The steam-exploded straw had higher porosity than non-treated straw. In addition, the steam-exploded straw was easier to compress since it had lower yield strength or failure stress values compared to non-treated straw.