Abstract
We established a working Extensible Markup Language (XML) compression benchmark based on text compression, and found that bzip2 compresses XML best, albeit more slowly than gzip. Our experiments verified that T/sub XMILL/ speeds up and improves compression using gzip and bounded-context PPM by up to 15%, but found that it worsens the compression for bzip2 and PPM. We describe alternative approaches to XML compression that illustrate other tradeoffs between speed and effectiveness. We describe experiments using several text compressors and XMILL to compress a variety of XML documents. Using these as a benchmark, we describe our two main results: an online binary encoding for XML called Encoded SAX (ESAX) that compresses better and faster than existing methods; and an online, adaptive, XML-conscious encoding based on prediction by partial match (PPM) called multiplexed hierarchical modeling (MHM) that compresses up to 35 % better than any existing method but is fairly slow.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.