Abstract
Five different codes have been used to simulate the identical problem in reversed-field pinch (RFP) dynamics using the resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model in three dimensions with the same set of initial and boundary conditions. Three codes are compressible, while two are incompressible. The assumption of incompressibility was made in the spirit of reducing the model so that, for example, the codes would run faster while retaining the relevant physics. The results show that the three compressible codes agree quite well with each other and the two incompressible codes agree with each other also, but the compressible and incompressible models show qualitatively different behavior. Most importantly, for a certain set of boundary and initial conditions, the compressible codes predict field reversal maintenance while the incompressible codes do not. Thus compressibility is an important feature of RFP physics. This is in contrast to tokamak physics where the strong toroidal field enforces incompressibility at low poloidal beta.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
