Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has recently emerged in China and caused a disease called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The virus quickly spread around the world, causing a sustained global outbreak. Although SARS-CoV-2, and other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV) are highly similar genetically and at the protein production level, there are significant differences between them. Research has shown that the structural spike (S) protein plays an important role in the evolution and transmission of SARS-CoV-2. So far, studies have shown that various genes encoding primarily for elements of S protein undergo frequent mutation. We have performed an in-depth review of the literature covering the structural and mutational aspects of S protein in the context of SARS-CoV-2, and compared them with those of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Our analytical approach consisted in an initial genome and transcriptome analysis, followed by primary, secondary and tertiary protein structure analysis. Additionally, we investigated the potential effects of these differences on the S protein binding and interactions to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), and we established, after extensive analysis of previous research articles, that SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV use different ends/regions in S protein receptor-binding motif (RBM) and different types of interactions for their chief binding with ACE2. These differences may have significant implications on pathogenesis, entry and ability to infect intermediate hosts for these coronaviruses. This review comprehensively addresses in detail the variations in S protein, its receptor-binding characteristics and detailed structural interactions, the process of cleavage involved in priming, as well as other differences between coronaviruses.

Highlights

  • A novel coronavirus emerged inChina in 2019

  • SARS-CoV-2 may use Collectively, these results indicate SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV, and suggest SARSvarious sites, glycosylation which may contribute to its pandemic spread, to itsspread, antigenic

  • Researchers argue that this similarity strongly suggests the convergent evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) structures to improve binding affinity to the same angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, even though SARS-CoV-2 does not cluster within SARS-CoV in the beta coronavirus genus [6,42]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, or SARS-CoV-2) emerged in. Understanding the potential effects of these variations would be helpful towards determining the range of available intermediate hosts, as well as their effects on immunogenicity and treatment Structural information at this atomic level has the potential to improve our understanding of the interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and its variants with infection susceptible cells, help identify robust target regions for neutralizing antibodies and and treatment. Structural information at this atomic levelinhas potential to improve assistimmunogenicity with structure-based drug and vaccine design, urgently needed thethe fight against. Cells, help identify robust target regions for neutralizing antibodies and assist with structure-based drug and vaccine design, urgently needed in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 [6]

Genome
Differences in Transcriptome
Role of S Protein in Pathogenesis
Aligned
Terminal Region 1
Terminal Region 2
Structure of TR2 and ridge regions both SARS-CoV
Middle
Other Regions of S Protein
Is ACE2 the Receptor for S Protein?
Differences in Furin-Like Protease Recognition Pattern
(Figures and
(Figures
11. Binding
12. Cartoon representation ofof the betweenACE2
Findings
10. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call