Abstract
In security and foreign policy discourse, environmental issues have been discussed increasingly as security threats that require immediate action. Yet, as the traditional security sector does not provide straightforward means to deal with climate change and other environmental issues, this has prompted concerns over undue securitisation and ill-placed extreme measures. We argue that an effective policy to address foreseeable environmental security threats can only be developed and maintained by ensuring that it remains resolutely within the domain of civil society. In this article, we consider the case of Finland, where the policy concept of comprehensive security has been presented as the official guideline for security and preparedness activities in different sectors. Comprehensive security aims to safeguard the vital functions of society through cooperation between authorities, business operators, organisations, and citizens. We analyse the opportunities and challenges of Finland’s comprehensive security policy in addressing environmental changes through a three-level framework of local, geopolitical and structural security impacts. Our empirical evidence is based on a set of expert interviews (n = 40) that represent a wide range of fields relevant to unconventional security issues. We find that the Finnish comprehensive security model provides an example of a wide and inclusive perspective to security which would allow for taking into account environmental security concerns. However, due to major challenges in the implementation of the model, it does not fully incorporate the long-term, cross-sectoral, and cascading aspects of environmental threats. This weakens Finland’s preparedness against climate change which currently poses some of the most urgent environmental security problems.
Highlights
Global environmental deterioration and resource deple‐ tion have for decades been recognized as increas‐ ingly central considerations in security policy (e.g., U.S.Politics and Governance, 2021, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 91–101Council on Environmental Quality and Department of State, 1982), and the issue has gained international recognition, including several debates at the United Nations Security Council (Scott, 2015)
We share these concerns but argue that for policy to be effec‐ tive in addressing the foreseeable environmental secu‐ rity threats, it needs to remain resolutely within the domain of civil society
Analysing the Security Strategy for Society (Prime Minister’s Office, 2017), we find several opportunities supporting the integration of environmental issues into security policymaking
Summary
Global environmental deterioration and resource deple‐ tion have for decades been recognized as increas‐ ingly central considerations in security policy We use Finland as a case study to show that the concept of comprehensive security, which cur‐ rently guides the country’s preparedness activities in dif‐ ferent sectors of the civil society, offers a promising policy model for addressing environmental threats without hard securitisation. Most importantly, as it is based on the idea of wide cooperation among different sectors, com‐ prehensive security takes a broad and inclusive perspec‐ tive on security. The implementation of the model is not straightforward but potentially frictional and inter‐ spersed within multiple levels and sectors of society In their everyday work the experts face challenges in embedding environmental change in the comprehensive security model, and vice versa.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.