Abstract
Dr. Pechman argues that Professor Bittker misunderstands the implications of the Haig-Simons definition of income. The accretion concept is meant to define income, and is not designed to determine the time interval, the proper unit of taxation, or the personal deductions that might be allowed for tax purposes. Professor Bittker has devoted most of his discussion to these elements and as a result most of his criticisms are irrelevant to an assessment of the worth of the concept.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
