Abstract

Most patients with hip fractures are characterised by older age (>70 years), frailty, and functional deterioration, and their long-term outcomes are poor with increased costs. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of giving these patients comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated geriatric ward versus the usual orthopaedic care. We did a prospective, single-centre, randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial. Between April 18, 2008, and Dec 30, 2010, we randomly assigned home-dwelling patients with hip-fractures aged 70 years or older who were able to walk 10 m before their fracture, to either comprehensive geriatric care or orthopaedic care in the emergency department, to achieve the required sample of 400 patients. Randomisation was achieved via a web-based, computer-generated, block method with unknown block sizes. The primary outcome, analysed by intention to treat, was mobility measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) 4 months after surgery for the fracture. The type of treatment was not concealed from the patients or staff delivering the care, and assessors were only partly masked to the treatment during follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00667914. We assessed 1077 patients for eligibility, and excluded 680, mainly for not meeting the inclusion criteria such as living in a nursing home or being aged less than 70 years. Of the remaining patients, we randomly assigned 198 to comprehensive geriatric care and 199 to orthopaedic care. At 4 months, 174 patients remained in the comprehensive geriatric care group and 170 in the orthopaedic care group; the main reason for dropout was death. Mean SPPB scores at 4 months were 5·12 (SE 0·20) for comprehensive geriatric care and 4·38 (SE 0·20) for orthopaedic care (between-group difference 0·74, 95% CI 0·18-1·30, p=0·010). Immediate admission of patients aged 70 years or more with a hip fracture to comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated ward improved mobility at 4 months, compared with the usual orthopaedic care. The results suggest that the treatment of older patients with hip fractures should be organised as orthogeriatric care. Norwegian Research Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority, St Olav Hospital Trust and Fund for Research and Innovation, Liaison Committee between Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, the Department of Neuroscience at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Foundation for Scientific and Industrial Research at the Norwegian Institute of Technology (SINTEF), and the Municipality of Trondheim.

Highlights

  • Fragility fractures are common and serious events affecting mainly elderly people

  • The study population is the same as in Paper 2.We investigated if pre-fracture function by Nottingham Extended ADL scale (NEAS), gender, type of fracture (intra (ICF) - or extra (ECF)-capsular) and/or age may influence the effect of comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) on mobility by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), p-Activities of daily living (ADL) by Barthel Index (BI), instrumental activities of daily living (i-ADL) by NEAS, and cognition by Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)

  • The overall aim of the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial was to investigate if comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) performed in an orthogeriatric ward was beneficial as compared to conventional orthopaedic care (OC) in an orthopaedic ward. [315]We performed a randomized parallel group clinical trial to study if a model with a geriatrician led orthogeriatric ward (Model 3 in the introduction) improved outcome as compared to a traditional orthopedic treatment for home-dwelling patients over 70 years of age who had been able to walk before the fracture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fragility fractures are common and serious events affecting mainly elderly people. Osteoporosis and falls are the underlying conditions, and many patients are frail and have co-morbidities and use several drugs.[1]. Most older people who fracture a hip are frail, have comorbidities, and show a functional deterioration that is typical of geriatric patients.3 After a fracture, both short-term and long-term outlooks for patients are generally poor, with increased 1 year mortality (18–33%), and negative effects on activities of daily living and mobility. Hip fractures are common among frail elderly persons and often have serious consequences on function, mobility and mortality Traditional treatment of these patients is performed in orthopedic departments without additional geriatric assessment. Studies of postoperative rehabilitation indicate improved efficiency of multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation as compared to traditional care This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate whether an additional comprehensive geriatric assessment of hip fracture patients in a special orthogeriatric unit during the acute in-hospital phase may improve outcomes as compared to treatment as usual in an orthopaedic unit.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call