Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations play a pivotal role in elucidating the dynamic behaviors of RNA structures, offering a valuable complement to traditional methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance or X-ray. Despite this, the current precision of RNA force fields lags behind that of protein force fields. In this work, we systematically compared the performance of four RNA force fields (ff99bsc0χOL3, AMBERDES, ff99OL3_CMAP1, AMBERMaxEnt) across diverse RNA structures. Our findings highlight significant challenges in maintaining stability, particularly with regard to cross-strand and cross-loop hydrogen bonds. Furthermore, we observed the limitations in accurately describing the conformations of nonhelical structural motif, terminal nucleotides, and also base pairing and base stacking interactions by the tested RNA force fields. The identified deficiencies in existing RNA force fields provide valuable insights for subsequent force field development. Concurrently, these findings offer recommendations for selecting appropriate force fields in RNA simulations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.