Comprehensive Analysis of the Global Zenith Tropospheric Delay Real-Time Correction Model Based GPT3

Abstract

To obtain a higher accuracy for the real-time Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD), a refined tropospheric delay correction model was constructed by combining the tropospheric delay correction model based on meteorological parameters and the GPT3 model. The meteorological parameters provided by the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) Atmosphere and the zenith tropospheric delay data provided by Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) were used as references, and the accuracy and spatial–temporal characteristics of the proposed model were compared and studied. The results show the following: (1) Compared with the UNB3m, GPT and GPT2w models, the accuracy and stability of the GPT3 model were significantly improved, especially the estimation accuracy of temperature, the deviation (Bias) of the estimated temperature was reduced by 90.60%, 32.44% and 0.30%, and the root mean square error (RMS) was reduced by 42.40%, 11.02% and 0.11%, respectively. (2) At different latitudes, the GPT3 + Saastamoinen, GPT3 + Hopfield and UNB3m models had great differences in accuracy and applicability. In the middle and high latitudes, the Biases of the GPT3 + Saastamoinen model and the GPT3 + Hopfield model were within 0.60 cm, and the RMS values were within 4 cm; the Bias of the UNB3m model was within 2 cm, and the RMS was within 5 cm; in low latitudes, the accuracy and stability of the GPT3 + Saastamoinen model were better than those of the GPT3 + Hopfield and UNB3m models; compared with the GPT3 + Hopfield model, the Bias was reduced by 22.56%, and the RMS was reduced by 5.67%. At different heights, the RMS values of the GPT3 + Saastamoinen model and GPT3 + Hopfield model were better than that of the UNB3m model. When the height was less than 500 m, the Biases of the GPT3 + Saastamoinen, GPT3 + Hopfield and UNB3m models were 3.46 cm, 3.59 cm and 4.54 cm, respectively. At more than 500 m, the Biases of the three models were within 4 cm. In different seasons, the Bias of the ZTD estimated by the UNB3m model had obvious global seasonal variation. The GPT3 + Saastamoinen model and the GPT3 + Hopfield model were more stable, and the values were within 5 cm. The research results can provide a useful reference for the ZTD correction accuracy and applicability of GNSS navigation and positioning at different latitudes, at different heights and in different seasons.