Abstract

Purpose: To comprehensively analyze N6-methyladenosine modification patterns in bladder tumors and to further systematically explore the inherent relationships between these modification patterns and multiomic tumor characteristics.Materials and Methods: A total of 901 bladder tumor samples, including 405 samples from TCGA database, 188 samples from GSE13507 and 308 samples from GSE32894, were included in this systematic analysis. The N6-methyladenosine modification patterns were identified utilizing unsupervised clustering analysis. To quantify N6-methyladenosine modification patterns, the m6Ascore of individual sample was developed using principal component analysis algorithms. Relationships among immune infiltration, tumor mutation burden, various clinical characteristics, molecular subtypes, and the m6Ascore were systematically analyzed. The guiding value of m6Ascore in immunotherapy was further validated in an external trial cohort. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer expression references were also utilized to perform drug sensitivity analysis for patients with distinct m6A modification patterns.Results: We determined three different N6-methyladenosine modification patterns for 901 bladder tumors. The quantitative m6Ascore of individual sample derived from N6-methyladenosine modification patterns could play a significant role in predicting overall survival, immune cell infiltration, and classic oncogene mutations. A low m6Ascore combined with high tumor mutation burden indicated better survival outcomes (p < 0.001). A higher m6Ascore also indicated a higher grade, higher T and N stage, elder ages, higher death rate, and higher PD1/PDL1/CTLA4 expressions (p < 0.01). The Basal type tended to exhibit significantly higher m6Ascores than the Luminal and Neuronal subtypes. External immunotherapy cohorts demonstrated that no difference in therapeutic effects was noted between the high and low m6Ascore groups when anti-PD1 immunotherapy was exclusively administered. When anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy were simultaneously administered, the high m6Ascore group had a significantly better prognosis than the low m6Ascore group (p < 0.001). High m6A groups were potentially sensitive to various medical treatments including Bleomycin, Bortezomib, Cisplatin, Cyclopamine, Dasatinib, Docetaxe, Rapamycin, and Vinblastine in this study.Conclusions: This study systematically revealed the important roles of m6A methylation modification patterns in bladder tumors. Detailed quantification of m6A modification patterns could improve our understanding of the bladder tumor microenvironments and could provide guidance for future immunotherapy strategies.

Highlights

  • Bladder cancer was viewed as the most common malignant cancer originating from the urinary tract and had caused >200 thousand deaths worldwide [1]

  • A total of 23 N6methyladenosine modification (m6A) modification regulators were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort with the available Copy Number Variations (CNV) and gene mutation files

  • There was no difference identified for m6Ascore between the wild-type and mutant-type ATM and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) groups. These results indicated that the m6A methylation modification patterns were closely related to the activity of reported oncogenes for bladder tumors, such as Tumor Protein 53 (TP53), retinoblastoma 1 (RB1), ERCC excision repair (ERCC2), EP300, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3), and ELF3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bladder cancer was viewed as the most common malignant cancer originating from the urinary tract and had caused >200 thousand deaths worldwide [1]. The global incidence of bladder cancer in males was ∼4-fold higher than that in females [2]. Various characteristics, including muscle invasive/non-invasive status and pathological grade, were currently utilized to guide treatment strategies and patient prognosis. The pathogenesis mechanism for bladder cancer was rather complex, and more detailed biological studies were urgently needed to improve the current prognosis. The classical oncogene mutations responsible for bladder cancer included TP53, RB1, ERCC2, and FGFR3 [3]. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was suggested as the first-line treatment for advanced bladder tumors, and immunotherapy was suggested as a second-line treatment [4]. Longterm responses to current therapies were rare, and tumors often relapsed within the 5 years due to the limited understanding of their progressive mechanism

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call