Comprehensive analysis and experimental verification of the mechanism of anoikis related genes in pancreatic cancer

Abstract

BackgroundPancreatic cancer (PC), characterized by its aggressive nature and low patient survival rate, remains a challenging malignancy. Anoikis, a process inhibiting the spread of metastatic cancer cells, is closely linked to cancer progression and metastasis through anoikis-related genes. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism of action of these genes in PC remains unclear. MethodsStudy data were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, with validation data accessed at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differential expression analysis and univariate Cox analysis were performed to determine prognostically relevant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with anoikis. Unsupervised cluster analysis was then employed to categorize cancer samples. Subsequently, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was conducted on the identified DEGs to establish a clinical prognostic gene signature. Using risk scores derived from this signature, patients with cancer were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups, with further assessment conducted via survival analysis, immune infiltration analysis, and mutation analysis. External validation data were employed to confirm the findings, and Western blot and immunohistochemistry were utilized to validate risk genes for the clinical prognostic gene signature. ResultsA total of 20 prognostic-related DEGs associated with anoikis were obtained. The TCGA dataset revealed two distinct subgroups: cluster 1 and cluster 2. Utilizing the 20 DEGs, a clinical prognostic gene signature comprising two risk genes (CDKN3 and LAMA3) was constructed. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups per their risk scores, with the latter exhibiting a superior survival rate. Statistically significant variation was noted across immune infiltration and mutation levels between the two groups. Validation cohort results were consistent with the initial findings. Additionally, experimental verification confirmed the high expression of CDKN3 and LAMA3 in tumor samples. ConclusionOur study addresses the gap in understanding the involvement of genes linked to anoikis in PAAD. The clinical prognostic gene signature developed herein accurately stratifies patients with PAAD, contributing to the advancement of precision medicine for these patients.