Abstract

Compound grating discrimination was measured in normal foveal and extrafoveal vision as well as in central vision of amblyopic subjects. Two types of discrimination were examined: 0 degrees versus 180 degrees and 90 degrees versus 270 degrees phase shift of the second harmonic relative to the fundamental. In common with several previous studies, we found that both 0/180 and 90/270 discriminations are possible in extrafoveal vision. However, we show that differences in foveal and extrafoveal sensitivity can be eliminated for both types of discrimination by scaling the stimulus size appropriately. The extent of spatial magnification necessary to equate foveal and extrafoveal performance differed markedly, with 90/270 discriminations requiring much more magnification. In the amblyopic subjects, the magnitude of the 90/270 deficit was greater than the 0/180 deficit in all six amblyopes tested. In common with previous investigations, we suggest that the visual system adopts a discrimination strategy, based upon differences in local features, between the patterns to be discriminated. One process registers positional relationships, while a second process registers local contrast differences. In this context, the reduced ability of the normal periphery and amblyopic fovea to perform mirror-symmetric discriminations is explained in terms of losses in positional acuity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.