Abstract

The current studies (N = 1,709) explore why demographic composition of place matters. First, this work demonstrates that relative level of group representation affects one’s experience of place in the form of self-definition (self-categorization), perceptions of place being representative or characteristic of factors that distinguish the group from others (place-prototypicality), and sense of belonging (place-identification; Studies 1a-1e; Studies 2a & 2b). Second, the studies illustrate that group representation within place shapes the way group member’s approach (i.e., expectations of group-based treatment and procedural justice; Studies 2a-2c), understand (i.e., attribution for group-based events, Study 2b; responsiveness to bias-reduction intervention, Study 4a; sense of solidarity, Study 4b), and behave (i.e., prejudice, Studies 3a & 3b; collective action, Study 4c). More broadly, I present a Social identity Paradigm for Contextualized Experience (SPACE) that provides an organizing framework for the study of the impact of characteristics of place on social identity-based contextualized experience and (in turn) collective behavior. Taken together, the findings provide evidence of distinct psychological experience and orientation as a function of minority versus majority-group status within place, as well as for a group-based approach to place. Implications for the study of collective and intergroup behavior are discussed.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesParticipants were instructed to ‘assume you were in the market for a job’ and that the purpose of the study was to ‘evaluate the attractiveness of an organization.’

  • “Are there few or many people like me here?” is a question that becomes salient to a person almost immediately upon entering a space or place

  • Composition of place, social identity-based experience, & collective behavior well as minority-group expectations of procedural justice and willingness to partner with law enforcement organizations (Study 2c)

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Participants were instructed to ‘assume you were in the market for a job’ and that the purpose of the study was to ‘evaluate the attractiveness of an organization.’. Participants were instructed to “imagine they had been accepted to a University” and told the purpose of the study was to understand how people “respond to everyday events on campus.”. Composition of place, social identity-based experience, & collective behavior they had been accepted to a University’ and told the purpose of the study was to understand how people ‘respond to everyday events on campus.’.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call