Abstract

This study focused on the composition dependence of the crystal structure and cathode performance of xLi(Li1/3Mn2/3)O2–(1 − x)Li(Mn1/3Ni1/3Co1/3)O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) prepared by co-precipitation. From charge-discharge tests, it was found that there was large differences in the battery performance between the composition of x = 0.2 and x ≥ 0.3. For the samples, the average crystal structures were determined by the Rietveld refinement of neutron diffraction patterns. The results indicated that for x = 0.2, Li existed at both 2b and 4g sites, whereas for x ≥ 0.3, Li was localized at 2b sites and Mn occupied the 4g sites. In order to examine the local crystal structure, pair distribution function (PDF) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analyses were carried out. From the PDF analysis, a significant difference was seen in the short-range peaks associated with the transition metal layer for x = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6. The EXAFS results indicated a large difference in the local structure around Mn for x = 0.2 and x ≥ 0.3. This is thought to be due to ordering of LiMn6 and LiMn5Ni, which is likely to affect cathode performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.