Composition and Gender Distribution of Editorial Boards for Top Neurosurgical Journals

Abstract

Though women now comprise approximately 21.5% of all neurosurgery residents in the United States, women only represent 10% of practicing neurosurgeons nationally. Serving as a journal editor is 1 measure of academic success. We investigated characteristics of editorial boards for top neurosurgical journals to identify factors influencing membership on editorial boards. We sought to identify gender differences to explain the paucity of women on editorial boards. This is a cross-sectional study of editorial boards for the top 10 English-language neurosurgical journals. Data were obtained from journal websites, program faculty lists, or physician online profiles. Gender differences were compared using Student t test and χ2 analysis. Seven hundred twenty-two editorial board members were examined (female n= 65; male n= 650; unidentified n= 7). Overall, women had fewer years in practice (P= 0.002) and more often had additional advanced degrees (P= 0.009) while men had higher h-indices (P < 0.0001). Within the boards of Neurosurgery and Acta Neurochirurgica, men had been in practice longer (P= 0.014; P= 0.023) and had higher h-indices (P= 0.003; P= 0.025). Male editors for Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine and World Neurosurgery had higher h-indices (P= 0.007; P= 0.018). Women constitute ∼9% of editorial boards for top neurosurgical journals, a percentage comparable to the amount of practicing female academic neurosurgeons. This finding is encouraging as in that there appears to be no readily identifiable bias in the selection of editorial board members. The differences in years in practice and h-index suggest that gender distribution may equalize with time as more women enter practice and produce scientific literature. Efforts to recruit and retain women in neurosurgery should be pursued to rectify this discrepancy.