Composition and Bioactivity of a Placental Tissue Particulate (PTP-001) Indicate Greater Potential than Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare therapeutically relevant properties of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a commonly used autologous intra-articular treatment for osteoarthritis (OA), with those of a novel placental tissue particulate, PTP-001, which is in development as a regulated biologic treatment for knee OA. Quantitative immunoassays were performed to determine the content of key growth/regulatory biofactors in PTP-001, and in leukocyte-rich (LR)-PRP or leukocyte-poor (LP)-PRP. An anti-inflammatory bioassay was used to evaluate the effects of each treatment on pro-inflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) production in a macrophage cell culture system. Gene expression experiments were conducted using a co-culture system of human synoviocytes (pre-stimulated with interleukin (IL)-1β) and articular chondrocytes, with quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the separate cellular compartments. The concentrations of several biofactors (e.g., basic fibroblast growth factor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-3, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) representative of diverse disease-relevant mechanisms of action were significantly higher for PTP-001 relative to LR-PRP or LP-PRP. PTP-001 and PRP preparations were able to reduce TNF-α production in macrophage cell cultures; however, greater variability was observed for PRP in comparison with PTP-001. In the chondrocyte/synoviocyte co-culture experiments, PTP-001 and LR-PRP (but not LP-PRP) significantly reduced chondrocyte MMP13 expression in cultures containing IL-1-pretreated synoviocytes. In addition, ADAMTS5 expression was reduced in the chondrocyte compartment following treatment with PTP-001 relative to PRP. These findings support evidence of a potent, multifactorial mechanism of action for a consistently manufactured biologic (PTP-001), which may be of greater therapeutic benefit in comparison with more heterogeneous preparations of PRP which may be generated at the time of treatment.