Abstract

Through the creation of an original theoretical framework, this paper demonstrates the value of a deeper engagement between autonomist Marxism and (urban) geography. By spatialising arguably the autonomists’ key theoretical contribution – class composition – the paper develops the ideas of technical and political spatial compositions. These dialectically intertwined concepts provide a framework with which to analyse the relationships between shifting urban spaces and struggles, and clarity is therefore added to another key autonomist concept, the evocative yet nebulous ‘social factory’. Applying these to Buenos Aires, the paper focuses on various spatial conjunctures, exploring their emergence and the immanent potentials for radical spatial politics they afford and preclude. In particular, the paper provides a detailed reading of the complex role Buenos Aires’ ‘informal’ settlements play in both perpetuating and resisting a neoliberal, financially extractive economy. The benefit of a ‘spatial composition’ framework is twofold: it provides a periodising heuristic with which to originally and usefully approach urban struggles, and, in unpacking the ‘social factory’, it can be applied widely as a form of radical geographical praxis. The paper thus makes important theoretical and empirical contributions to an exciting, emerging autonomist (urban) geography, as well as to studies of Buenos Aires.

Highlights

  • Despite a resurgence across the social sciences (e.g. Shukaitis, 2016; Woodcock, 2017; Wright, 2017), autonomist Marxist thought remains underexplored within contemporary geography

  • The work’s self-avowed focus is how urban space inflects/affects political compositions; a spatial analysis of class composition. This is insufficient: this paper shows the need for a concomitant class composition analysis of space

  • To develop a deep analysis of technical and political spatial compositions, this section first provides a historical overview of key shifts to Buenos Aires

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite a resurgence across the social sciences (e.g. Shukaitis, 2016; Woodcock, 2017; Wright, 2017), autonomist Marxist thought remains underexplored within contemporary geography. The concepts of technical and political spatial composition are introduced and developed into an original theoretical framework; one that can provide detailed understandings of the relationships between urban struggles and the production of urban spaces. By illustrating the rich geographical potential of an autonomist Marxist ‘socio-spatial dialectic’ (cf Soja, 1980), the paper a makes series of clear and important contributions It emphasises the importance of a (re)engagement with autonomist ideas, illustrating how the more common geographical uptake of post-autonomist concepts (see de Bloois et al, 2014; Purcell, 2012) has led to imprecision and the neglect of powerful tools with which to understand capitalism’s multiple, intersecting antagonisms (cf Pitts, 2018). The paper explores a socio-spatial dialectic, where intersectional, migrant class struggles shape urban space and vice-versa, demonstrating the power and originality of spatial composition analysis

Class composition
Fragments of an autonomist geography
Composing Buenos Aires
Spatial recomposition?
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call