Abstract

Context. The binary asteroid 288P/(300163) is unusual both for its combination of wide-separation and high mass ratio and for its comet-like activity. It is not currently known whether there is a causal connection between the activity and the unusual orbit or if instead the activity helped to overcome a strong detection bias against such sub-arcsecond systems. Aims. We aim to find observational constraints discriminating between possible formation scenarios and to characterise the physical properties of the system components. Methods. We measured the component separation and brightness using point spread function fitting to high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Camera 3 images from 25 epochs between 2011 and 2020. We constrained component sizes and shapes from the photometry, and we fitted a Keplerian orbit to the separation as a function of time. Results. Approximating the components A and B as prolate spheroids with semi-axis lengths a < b and assuming a geometric albedo of 0.07, we find aA ≤ 0.6 km, bA ≥ 1.4 km, aB ≤ 0.5 km, and bB ≥ 0.8 km. We find indications that the dust production may have concentrated around B and that the mutual orbital period may have changed by 1–2 days during the 2016 perihelion passage. Orbit solutions have semi-major axes in the range of (105–109) km, eccentricities between 0.41 and 0.51, and periods of (117.3–117.5) days pre-perihelion and (118.5–119.5) days post-perihelion, corresponding to system masses in the range of (6.67–7.23) × 1012 kg. The mutual and heliocentric orbit planes are roughly aligned. Conclusions. Based on the orbit alignment, we infer that spin-up of the precursor by the Yarkovsky-O’Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect led to the formation of the binary system. We disfavour (but cannot exclude) a scenario of very recent formation where activity was directly triggered by the break-up, because our data support a scenario with a single active component.

Highlights

  • The main-belt asteroid 288P combines comet-like activity with being a binary system having unusual properties. 288P was discovered as an asteroid by the Spacewatch astronomical survey1 at Kitt Peak National Observatory on 15 November 2006 and given the preliminary designation 2006 VW139

  • We find indications that the dust production may have concentrated around B and that the mutual orbital period may have changed by 1–2 days during the 2016 perihelion passage

  • Based on the orbit alignment, we infer that spin-up of the precursor by the Yarkovsky-O’Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect led to the formation of the binary system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main-belt asteroid 288P (asteroidal designation 300163) combines comet-like activity with being a binary system having unusual properties. 288P was discovered as an asteroid by the Spacewatch astronomical survey at Kitt Peak National Observatory on 15 November 2006 and given the preliminary designation 2006 VW139. 288P was discovered as an asteroid by the Spacewatch astronomical survey at Kitt Peak National Observatory on 15 November 2006 and given the preliminary designation 2006 VW139 Activity in this object was first reported on 28 November 2011 (Hsieh et al 2011) based on data from the Panoramic Survey Telescope And Rapid Response System (PanSTARRS) 1 telescope. 288P has been emitting dust for periods of several months (Hsieh et al 2012; Licandro et al 2013) during at least three perihelion passages (Agarwal et al 2016a; Hsieh et al 2018), suggesting that the activity is likely driven by a temperature-dependent process, such as the sublimation of ice. The orbit of 288P is located in the outer asteroid belt (semi-major axis, a = 3.047 AU, eccentricity, e = 0.201, and inclination, i = 3.2◦) and characterised by a Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter of TJ = 3.204, which is typical for asteroids. Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images show that 288P is a binary system with similarlysized (r ∼ 1 km) components and a wide separation (mutual semi-major axis a ∼ 100 km) (Agarwal et al 2016b, 2017), while known binary asteroids typically have either similar sizes or wide separations, but not both together

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call