Abstract

Background: The introduction of pipeline embolisation device (PED) has improved the feasibility of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The device allows for endoluminal reconstruction across the aneurysm neck but is permeable enough that flow is preserved across the pressure gradients into sidebranch arteries. In spite of higher rates of aneurysm occlusion, there is lack of data concerning medium to long-term clinical and imaging results. Methods: This study was a prospective single center analysis of complications, imaging results, and medium term clinical outcomes after PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We included cases over a 17-month period in a tertiary interventional neuroradiology center. We collected data on demographics, vascular risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic results post treatment, angiographic follow-up and clinical follow-up. Results: Thirty-three patients were included, 25 females and 8 males, with mean age of 55 years; 3 presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage and 30 for elective treatment. Thirty-seven aneurysms were treated: 35 Internal Carotid Artery (ICA), 1 basilar trunk fusiform, and 1 vertebral artery intradural dissecting aneurysms. No deaths have occurred. Five patients suffered transient neurological complications (15%). Overall aneurysm occlusion was demonstrated in 85% of patients at the end of one year. Discussion: Overall, the technique of flow diversion and endoluminal reconstruction differs greatly from the established endosaccular packing techniques of standard coiling, balloon remodeling, or stent assisted coiling. Our midterm follow-up confirms that, the rates of clinically significant complications compare favorably with published data on stent assisted coiling, potentially making these devices a truly revolutionizing technique.

Highlights

  • The introduction of flow-diverting or flow-directing devices is a significant addition to the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

  • The mesh wall of the device is dense enough to disrupt flow in and out of the aneurysm sac leading to stasis and thrombosis; but permeable enough that flow is preserved across the pressure gradients into side-branch arteries

  • pipeline embolisation device (PED) Constructs In 27 patients a single PED was deployed across the aneurysm neck

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of flow-diverting or flow-directing devices is a significant addition to the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. These stent-like devices are deployed in the parent artery to treat aneurysms by endoluminal reconstruction across the aneurysm neck, with or without endosaccular coil embolization. The introduction of pipeline embolisation device (PED) has improved the feasibility of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The device allows for endoluminal reconstruction across the aneurysm neck but is permeable enough that flow is preserved across the pressure gradients into sidebranch arteries. Methods: This study was a prospective single center analysis of complications, imaging results, and medium term clinical outcomes after PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Our midterm follow-up confirms that, the rates of clinically significant complications compare favorably with published data on stent assisted coiling, potentially making these devices a truly revolutionizing technique

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.