Abstract

Understanding behavioral strategies employed by animals to maximize fitness in the face of environmental heterogeneity, variability, and uncertainty is a central aim of animal ecology. Flexibility in behavior may be key to how animals respond to climate and environmental change. Using a mechanistic modeling framework for simultaneously quantifying the effects of habitat preference and intrinsic movement on space use at the landscape scale, we investigate how movement and habitat selection vary among individuals and years in response to forage quality–quantity tradeoffs, environmental conditions, and variable annual climate. We evaluated the association of dynamic, biotic forage resources and static, abiotic landscape features with large grazer movement decisions in an experimental landscape, where forage resources vary in response to prescribed burning, grazing by a native herbivore, the plains bison (Bison bison bison), and a continental climate. Our goal was to determine how biotic and abiotic factors mediate bison movement decisions in a nutritionally heterogeneous grassland. We integrated spatially explicit relocations of GPS‐collared bison and extensive vegetation surveys to relate movement paths to grassland attributes over a time period spanning a regionwide drought and average weather conditions. Movement decisions were affected by foliar crude content and low stature forage biomass across years with substantial interannual variation in the magnitude of selection for forage quality and quantity. These differences were associated with interannual differences in climate and growing conditions from the previous year. Our results provide experimental evidence for understanding how the forage quality–quantity tradeoff and fine‐scale topography drives fine‐scale movement decisions under varying environmental conditions.

Highlights

  • Many animals respond to environmental heterogeneity through selectivity in their choice of habitats to best fulfill basic requirements such as the need to feed, reproduce, and rear offspring (Brown et al 1999; Morris, 2003; Mueller & Fagan, 2008)

  • Resource-­driven movement patterns of bison in our experimental tallgrass prairie landscape are shaped by the forage quality–quantity tradeoff, site topography, and spatial distributions of resource availability

  • Food quality is influential in resource selection and movement, understanding large grazer distribution and movement is multidimensional

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many animals respond to environmental heterogeneity through selectivity in their choice of habitats to best fulfill basic requirements such as the need to feed, reproduce, and rear offspring (Brown et al 1999; Morris, 2003; Mueller & Fagan, 2008). Movement enables animals to mediate tradeoffs in life-­history requirements arising from the heterogeneous distribution of resources (Nathan, 2008). The spatial distribution of forage and its associated nutritive value are fundamental components underlying foraging behavior, resource selection, and landscape-­level distribution (Bailey et al, 1996; Fynn, 2012; Prins & van Langevelde, 2008; Senft et al, 1987; Spalinger & Hobbs, 1992). Identifying the determinants of large grazer distribution is important for the effective management of both rangelands and the populations of grazers inhabiting them (Archer & Smeins, 1991; Dale et al, 2000; Fynn, 2012). Understanding how ecologically significant resources such as forage biomass and forage nutrient content affect grazer resource selection is necessary for informing management strategies (Senft, Rittenhouse, & Woodmansee, 1985), in areas experiencing reduced growing season precipitation and increasing ecosystem sensitivity due to climate change (Briske et al, 2015; Knapp et al, 2015)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call