Abstract

Main objectives of this study were to investigate accuracy, bias and power of linear and threshold model segregation analysis methods for detection of major genes in categorical traits in farm animals. Maximum Likelihood Linear Model (MLLM), Bayesian Linear Model (BALM) and Bayesian Threshold Model (BATM) were applied to simulated data on normal, categorical and binary scales as well as to disease data in pigs. Simulated data on the underlying normally distributed liability (NDL) were used to create categorical and binary data. MLLM method was applied to data on all scales (Normal, categorical and binary) and BATM method was developed and applied only to binary data. The MLLM analyses underestimated parameters for binary as well as categorical traits compared to normal traits; with the bias being very severe for binary traits. The accuracy of major gene and polygene parameter estimates was also very low for binary data compared with those for categorical data; the later gave results similar to normal data. When disease incidence (on binary scale) is close to 50%, segregation analysis has more accuracy and lesser bias, compared to diseases with rare incidences. NDL data were always better than categorical data. Under the MLLM method, the test statistics for categorical and binary data were consistently unusually very high (while the opposite is expected due to loss of information in categorical data), indicating high false discovery rates of major genes if linear models are applied to categorical traits. With Bayesian segregation analysis, 95% highest probability density regions of major gene variances were checked if they included the value of zero (boundary parameter); by nature of this difference between likelihood and Bayesian approaches, the Bayesian methods are likely to be more reliable for categorical data. The BATM segregation analysis of binary data also showed a significant advantage over MLLM in terms of higher accuracy. Based on the results, threshold models are recommended when the trait distributions are discontinuous. Further, segregation analysis could be used in an initial scan of the data for evidence of major genes before embarking on molecular genome mapping.

Highlights

  • Traditional quantitative genetics theory and its application to animal breeding are based on the classical assumption that traits are controlled by a very large number of independent genes each having a small effect

  • The Gibbs sampling algorithms have found a wide-spread use in genetic analysis of quantitative traits recorded in pedigreed animal populations, due to its flexibility in solving complex and demanding statistical models, especially for categorical traits (e.g. Kadarmideen et al, 2001; Lee, 2002)

  • The major gene variance accounts for 73% of the total genetic variance of the trait and the difference between the values of the two homozygotes is 3.8 phenotypic standard deviation units of the trait

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional quantitative genetics theory and its application to animal breeding are based on the classical assumption that traits are controlled by a very large number of independent genes each having a small effect. Segregation analysis (Elston and Stewart, 1971) or Mixed Inheritance Models or MIM (to denote polygenic and major gene influence on the trait) has been proposed as a suitable and powerful method to identify segregating single major gene in livestock populations (Le Roy et al., 1989; Hill and Knott, 1990; Knott et al, 1991). It involves maximizing and comparing the likelihoods of the data under different genetic transmission models to determine whether the inheritance of the trait is controlled by a major gene. The Gibbs sampling algorithms have found a wide-spread use in genetic analysis of quantitative traits recorded in pedigreed animal populations, due to its flexibility in solving complex and demanding statistical models, especially for categorical traits (e.g. Kadarmideen et al, 2001; Lee, 2002)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call