Abstract

Phase retrieval refers to the problem of reconstructing an unknown vector x_0 in {mathbb {C}}^n or x_0 in {mathbb {R}}^n from m measurements of the form y_i = big vert langle xi ^{left( iright) }, x_0 rangle big vert ^2 , where left{ xi ^{left( iright) } right} ^m_{i=1} subset {mathbb {C}}^m are known measurement vectors. While Gaussian measurements allow for recovery of arbitrary signals provided the number of measurements scales at least linearly in the number of dimensions, it has been shown that ambiguities may arise for certain other classes of measurements left{ xi ^{left( iright) } right} ^{m}_{i=1} such as Bernoulli measurements or Fourier measurements. In this paper, we will prove that even when a subgaussian vector xi ^{left( iright) } in {mathbb {C}}^m does not fulfill a small-ball probability assumption, the PhaseLift method is still able to reconstruct a large class of signals x_0 in {mathbb {R}}^n from the measurements. This extends recent work by Krahmer and Liu from the real-valued to the complex-valued case. However, our proof strategy is quite different and we expect some of the new proof ideas to be useful in several other measurement scenarios as well. We then extend our results x_0 in {mathbb {C}}^n up to an additional assumption which, as we show, is necessary.

Highlights

  • Phase retrieval refers to the problem of reconstructing an unknown vector x0 ∈ Cn from m measurements of the form yi = | ξ (i), x0 |2 + wi, (1.1)Communicated by Holger Rauhut. 89 Page 2 of 27Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications (2020) 26:89 where the ξ (i) ∈ Cn are known measurement vectors and wi ∈ R represents additive noise

  • We extend our results x0 ∈ Cn up to an additional assumption which, as we show, is necessary

  • Such problems are ubiquituous in many areas of science and engineering such as X-ray crystallography [23,32], astronomical imaging [18], ptychography [35], and quantum tomography [28]

Read more

Summary

89 Page 2 of 27

Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications (2020) 26:89 where the ξ (i) ∈ Cn are known measurement vectors and wi ∈ R represents additive noise. This paper provides an analysis both for real-valued and complex-valued signals We believe that this understanding will be of importance for the subsequent study of structured scenarios such as coded diffraction patterns, which are intrinsically complex in nature. We control one of these cones using a restricted isometry property and one via the small-ball method We think that this novel viewpoint and some of the techniques developed in this paper will be useful for the analysis of other interesting measurement scenarios, such as the case of heavy-tailed measurement vectors ξ (i) or the case that ξ (i) has only entries 0 and 1

Notation
PhaseLift
89 Page 4 of 27
Subgaussian Measurements
Previous Work
Complex Signals and Complex Measurement Vectors
89 Page 6 of 27
Real Signals and Complex Measurement Vectors
89 Page 8 of 27
Proof of Theorem 2
89 Page 10 of 27
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof of Lemma 4
Proof of Lemmas 3 and 5
89 Page 16 of 27
89 Page 20 of 27
89 Page 22 of 27
89 Page 24 of 27
89 Page 26 of 27
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.