Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of short-term numerical forecasts of precipitation in the cold period of the Urals. The use of global (GEM and GFS) and mesoscale (WRF) models in forecasting of heavy snowfalls is considered. The reliability levels of the 15-h and 27-h forecasts with the GEM, GFS, and WRF models are approximately equal. The 39-h forecasts with the WRF model are least accurate. The dependences of the quality of model forecasting on synoptic-scale environments, seasonal patterns, geographical location, and topography are obtained. The heavy snowfall events formed by a warm front, a cold front, and in the northern part of a cyclone are predicted with satisfactory accuracy. The least successful numerical forecasts are obtained for non-frontal precipitation in the warm sector of a cyclone. All three models tend to overestimate the precipitation amount during the cold period: the number of false alarms exceeds the number of missed events. The numerical forecasts of precipitation during the cold period have higher reliability levels for the territory of Western Urals than for the Eastern Urals region.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.