Abstract

Hydrothermal gold deposits commonly form during protracted multistage ore-forming processes, however, discriminating among different ore-forming fluids and tracing their origin to unique or different repositories is a challenging task. The Huilvshan gold deposit in West Junggar (Xinjiang province, NW China), was affected by three hydrothermal stages and thus provides an opportunity to examine complex ore-forming processes. The deposit consists of gold-bearing quartz-sulfide veins and disseminated sulfides, hosted within Early Carboniferous basalts and tuffs. Three stages of hydrothermal pyrite (Py1, Py2, and Py3) were identified. Gold is only present in Py2 where it occurs as native gold inclusion and in invisible form. Anhedral Py1, disseminated in the altered basalt, is characterized by higher Ni (13.7 to 635 ppm) concentrations than Py2 and Py3. Euhedral-subhedral Py2 is the richest in Au (1.46 to 25.7 ppm) among three stages of pyrite. Py3 is subdivided into grains with zonal texture (Py3a) and irregular grains (Py3b). Both sub-types have high Sb (56.8 to 1599 ppm) and Tl (0.02 to 68.7 ppm) concentrations. In situ δ34S values of Py1 (-6.0 to 2.7 ‰) are similar to those of Py2 (-5.9 to 3.9 ‰), whereas Py3 has extremely negative δ34S values (-44.3 to-18.0 ‰).Ar-Ar ages of hydrothermal muscovite coexisting with Py2 indicate that the Huilvshan gold deposit formed at ∼300 Ma. The sulfur isotopic systematics of Py1 and Py2, close spatial and temporal relationship between the Huilvshan gold deposit and adjacent felsic intrusions, and paucity of regional metamorphic rocks in the region all suggest that hydrothermal fluids in stage I (Py1) and II (Py2) were derived from magmatism. On the other hand, stage III pyrite and associated sulfides more likely precipitated from a hydrothermal fluid that circulated in tuffs, based on the extremely negative δ34S values of Py3, similar to those measured from framboidal pyrite in the host tuffs.Therefore, textural, trace elemental and sulfur isotope data from pyrite suggest different sources for the hydrothermal fluids in the Huilvshan gold deposit, and that magmatic activity may have contributed the most to the main ore-forming stage. The genesis of this Huilvshan gold deposit could provide significant insights into the origin of other hydrothermal gold deposits that show multiple sulfide generations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call