Abstract

BackgroundThe microbial community in the gut of termites is responsible for the efficient decomposition of recalcitrant lignocellulose. Prominent features of this community are its complexity and the associations of prokaryotes with the cells of cellulolytic flagellated protists. Bacteria in the order Bacteroidales are involved in associations with a wide variety of gut protist species as either intracellular endosymbionts or surface-attached ectosymbionts. In particular, ectosymbionts exhibit distinct morphological patterns of the associations. Therefore, these Bacteroidales symbionts provide an opportunity to investigate not only the coevolutionary relationships with the host protists and their morphological evolution but also how symbiotic associations between prokaryotes and eukaryotes occur and evolve within a complex symbiotic community.ResultsMolecular phylogeny of 31 taxa of Bacteroidales symbionts from 17 protist genera in 10 families was examined based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Their localization, morphology, and specificity were also examined by fluorescent in situ hybridizations. Although a monophyletic grouping of the ectosymbionts occurred in three related protist families, the symbionts of different protist genera were usually dispersed among several phylogenetic clusters unique to termite-gut bacteria. Similar morphologies of the associations occurred in multiple lineages of the symbionts. Nevertheless, the symbionts of congeneric protist species were closely related to one another, and in most cases, each host species harbored a unique Bacteroidales species. The endosymbionts were distantly related to the ectosymbionts examined so far.ConclusionThe coevolutionary history of gut protists and their associated Bacteroidales symbionts is complex. We suggest multiple independent acquisitions of the Bacteroidales symbionts by different protist genera from a pool of diverse bacteria in the gut community. In this sense, the gut could serve as a reservoir of diverse bacteria for associations with the protist cells. The similar morphologies are considered a result of evolutionary convergence. Despite the complicated evolutionary history, the host-symbiont relationships are mutually specific, suggesting their cospeciations at the protist genus level with only occasional replacements.

Highlights

  • The microbial community in the gut of termites is responsible for the efficient decomposition of recalcitrant lignocellulose

  • The relationship between termites and cellulolytic protists in their gut is a well-known example of symbiosis; gut protists are essential for the survival of termites that thrive on cellulosic matter [2]

  • The associations of Bacteroidales bacteria with gut protists were surveyed in various species of termites by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a group-specific probe for this order

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The microbial community in the gut of termites is responsible for the efficient decomposition of recalcitrant lignocellulose Prominent features of this community are its complexity and the associations of prokaryotes with the cells of cellulolytic flagellated protists. Gut protists of termites belong to either the phylum Parabasalia or the order Oxymonadida (phylum Preaxostyla) and most of them are unique to termites and related wood-feeding cockroaches of the genus Cryptocercus [3,4] They are very difficult to cultivate, and their molecular phylogeny has been studied without cultivation [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The direct transfer of gut fluids (nutrients) from anus to mouth between nest mates (proctodeal trophallaxis), allows the stable vertical transmission of gut symbionts from generation to generation [30]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.