Abstract

The quantitative use of stable isotopes (SIs) for trophic studies has seen a rapid growth whereas fatty acid (FA) studies remain mostly qualitative. We apply the Bayesian tool MixSIAR to both SI and FA data to estimate the diet of three sympatric predators: the crabeater (Lobodon carcinophaga), Weddell (Leptonychotes weddellii) and leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx). We used SI data of their vibrissae and FA data of their outer blubber to produce comparable diet estimates for the same individuals. Both SI and FA models predicted the same main diet components, although the predicted proportions differed. For the crabeater seal, both methods identified krill, Euphausia superba, as the main, and almost exclusive, food item, although the FA model estimated a slightly lower proportion, potentially due to the low lipid content of krill compared to the fish species used in the model. For the Weddell seal the FA model identified the fish Pleuragramma antarcticum as the most important prey, whereas the SI model was not able to distinguish among prey species, identifying a ‘fish-squid’ group as the main diet component. For the leopard seal, both models identified krill as the main contributor; however, the predicted proportions for the secondary sources differed. Although vibrissae and outer blubber may not represent the same timeframe, the use of MixSIAR with FA data provides diet estimates comparable to those obtained with SI data, thus, both approaches were complimentary. The use of both biotracers offers a feasible option to study diets of wild animals in a quantitative manner.

Highlights

  • The study of marine predators is challenging due to low encounter rates and laborious handling of wild animals

  • Prey species used to estimate the diet of crabeater seals via fatty acid (FA) were statistically different from each other

  • For stable isotope (SI)-based estimations, the groups were different (F3 = 209.44, P = 0.001), pairwise comparisons revealed that the fish species P. antarcticum and E. antarctica were not statistically different (F1 = 1.01, adjusted P = 1.00, Fig. 2b), they were combined into a single group named “Pa_Ea” (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of marine predators is challenging due to low encounter rates and laborious handling of wild animals. The implementation of new methods such as satellite transmitters and biochemical analyses has allowed to substantially broaden our knowledge of the behaviour and foraging ecology of marine predators (Iverson et al 1997). Biochemical methods, such as fatty acid (FA) and stable isotope (SI) analyses, can reconstruct diets by overcoming the caveats of the traditional techniques. Many FAs, polyunsaturated FAs, can only be synthesized at

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call