Abstract
Multiple feedback loops are often found in gene regulations for various cellular functions. In mammalian circadian clocks, oscillations of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) expression are caused by interacting negative feedback loops (NFLs) whose protein products with similar molecular functions repress each other. However, Per1 expression peaks earlier than Per2 in the pacemaker tissue, raising the question of whether the peak time difference reflects their different dynamical functions. Here, we address this question by analyzing phase responses of the circadian clock caused by light-induced transcription of both Per1 and Per2 mRNAs. Through mathematical analyses of dual NFLs, we show that phase advance is mainly driven by light inputs to the repressor with an earlier expression peak as Per1, whereas phase delay is driven by the other repressor with a later peak as Per2. Due to the complementary contributions to phase responses, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates between Per1 and Per2 determines the magnitude and direction of phase shifts at each time of day. Specifically, stronger Per1 light induction than Per2 results in a phase response curve (PRC) with a larger phase advance zone than delay zone as observed in rats and hamsters, whereas stronger Per2 induction causes a larger delay zone as observed in mice. Furthermore, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates required for entrainment is determined by the relation between the circadian and light-dark periods. Namely, if the autonomous period of a circadian clock is longer than the light-dark period, a larger light-induced transcription rate of Per1 than Per2 is required for entrainment, and vice versa. In short, the time difference between Per1 and Per2 expression peaks can differentiate their dynamical functions. The resultant complementary contributions to phase responses can determine entrainability of the circadian clock to the light-dark cycle.
Highlights
Complex gene regulatory networks are responsible for diverse cellular functions, such as transcriptional switches, adaptation, noise filtering, and genetic oscillations [1,2,3]
Functional differentiation of negative feedback loops mammals, dual negative feedback loops (NFLs) of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) genes are responsible for rhythm generation
We show that the time difference between expression peaks of two repressors, as in expression of Per genes, leads to functional differentiation: the NFL with an earlier expression peak of repressor, as Per1, contributes mainly to advancing the clock, whereas the other NFL with a later peak of repressor, as Per2, contributes to delaying the clock
Summary
Complex gene regulatory networks are responsible for diverse cellular functions, such as transcriptional switches, adaptation, noise filtering, and genetic oscillations [1,2,3] These gene regulatory networks often include multiple feedback regulations. Redundancy in multiple feedback regulations confers robustness on the system, but understanding whether and how redundant feedbacks acquire different functions is less resolved We address this question with the interacting negative feedback loops (NFLs) in the mammalian circadian clock system. A light signal administered at subjective dawn advances the clock, whereas one at subjective dusk or night delays the clock [4,5] Such advance and delay of the circadian clock are termed phase shifts. Plotting phase shifts as a function of the time of light administration results in a phase response curve (PRC), which predicts how the circadian clock entrains to LD cycles [4,6,7]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
