Abstract
European providers of complementary medicine may be surprised by the formal structures which their US counterparts face. A major hurdle to holistic practice in the USA is the statutory prohibition against the unlicensed practice of medicine. State statutes define 'medicine' broadly, creating a legal risk for unlicensed providers of holistic healthcare, as well as for licensed providers whose services are deemed to exceed their legislatively authorized scope of practice and cross into 'diagnosis' and 'treatment' of disease. This paper does not address scope of practice; rather, it focuses on the legal status of non-licensed (or 'unenfranchised') providers. For these providers, seeking occupational licensure will provide some protection against medical practice acts, as well as opportunity to elevate professional competence and prestige. However, many holistic providers prefer to remain outside the regulatory scheme. Mandatory licensure, title licensure and registration offer means of upgrading professional status and achieving state sanction for professional practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
