Abstract

Combined U–Pb and Hf isotopic analysis of detrital and igneous zircon provides information about variations in crustal addition vs. reworking through time. However, whereas detrital zircon data from only a few samples can provide information about extended periods of orogenic activity, this approach lacks the geological context that comes with studying igneous zircon and may not record mid- and deep-crustal sources or sources isolated from sites of deposition. Conversely, igneous zircon is likely to miss sources that were removed by later tectonic activity, but which may be preserved in the detrital record. The Central Gneiss Belt of the SW Grenville Province in Ontario has a relatively well-understood orogenic architecture and records active-margin growth and reworking between ca. 1900–1200 Ma. We present U–Pb and Hf isotope data of zircon from 30 orthogneiss samples ranging in age from ca. 1750 to 1250 Ma, covering all tectonostratigraphic levels of the Central Gneiss Belt. As expected, the detrital and igneous datasets display many of the same overall features, such as crustal growth along the SW Laurentian active margin; however, there are also some distinct differences. In particular, sedimentation appears to have taken place near the active margin, with little or no input from distal inboard sources, thus missing this significant component of reworked crust. This study highlights the need for a combination of detrital and igneous samples in order to provide the most complete picture of long-lived accretionary orogenic systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call