Abstract

The complement system is a component of the immune system involved in both recognition and response to pathogens, and it is implicated in an increasing number of homeostatic and disease processes. It is well documented that reperfusion of ischemic tissue results in complement activation and an inflammatory response that causes post-reperfusion injury. This occurs following cerebral ischemia and reperfusion and triggers secondary damage that extends beyond the initial infarcted area, an outcome that has rationalized the use of complement inhibitors as candidate therapeutics after stroke. In the central nervous system, however, recent studies have revealed that complement also has essential roles in synaptic pruning, neurogenesis, and neuronal migration. In the context of recovery after stroke, these apparent divergent functions of complement may account for findings that the protective effect of complement inhibition in the acute phase after stroke is not always maintained in the subacute and chronic phases. The development of effective stroke therapies based on modulation of the complement system will require a detailed understanding of complement-dependent processes in both early neurodegenerative events and delayed neuro-reparatory processes. Here, we review the role of complement in normal brain physiology, the events initiating complement activation after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, and the contribution of complement to both injury and recovery. We also discuss how the design of future experiments may better characterize the dual role of complement in recovery after ischemic stroke.

Highlights

  • Following cerebral ischemia, most patients reperfuse at least part of the ischemic area [1], and the restoration of blood flow initiates an inflammatory cascade that causes secondary neuronal injury which can have a significant impact on functional recovery

  • This occurs following cerebral ischemia and reperfusion and triggers secondary damage that extends beyond the initial infarcted area, an outcome that has rationalized the use of complement inhibitors as candidate therapeutics after stroke

  • TPA must be administered with 3 h of symptom onset, and since there is a risk of uncontrollable intracranial hemorrhage, physicians are often reluctant to use this drug, with the result that only about 5% of stroke patients are treated with type plasminogen activator (tPA) [4, 5]

Read more

Summary

Complement in the homeostatic and ischemic brain

Reviewed by: Tanja Kuhlmann, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany Rowan Paul Orme, Cardiff University, UK. It is well documented that reperfusion of ischemic tissue results in complement activation and an inflammatory response that causes post-reperfusion injury. This occurs following cerebral ischemia and reperfusion and triggers secondary damage that extends beyond the initial infarcted area, an outcome that has rationalized the use of complement inhibitors as candidate therapeutics after stroke. We review the role of complement in normal brain physiology, the events initiating complement activation after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, and the contribution of complement to both injury and recovery. We discuss how the design of future experiments may better characterize the dual role of complement in recovery after ischemic stroke.

Introduction
Complement in homeostatic and ischemic brain
The Complement System
Complement in Brain Homeostasis
Complement in Brain Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury
Findings
Species Model
Unilateral common carotid ligation and hypoxic atmosphere exposure
Permanent MCAO
Photochemical cortical vein occlusion
Clinical and Translational Perspective
Matched controls
Common terminal pathway
None None
Terminal Pathway

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.