Abstract

The ant assemblage structure can be molded by mechanisms such as competition and dominance-discovery trade-off. In harsh circumstances is likely that ant species who control the food resource are the first to arrive at the baits, are more aggressive (behavioral dominance), abundant (numerical dominance) and, thus, ecologically dominants. By this characteristics combination, the dominance-discovery should not be a trade-off, but a positive relationship. Here, we examined the interactions among nine ant species in a rocky field area, in the Ibitipoca State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. By offering baits, we observe the dominance-discovery ability and the behaviors of attack, avoidance and coexistence of each species. We showed that Crematogaster sericea , Pheidole obscurithorax and Pheidole radoszkowskii were the best discoverers of the food resource and dominated it numerically, being this way considered ecologically dominants. Despite P. radoszkowskii being part of this relationship, this interpretation should be taken cautiously. Its dominance at the baits was assured by their high discovery ability and abundance, but the behavioral strategy exhibited was avoidance, not aggressiveness as C. sericea and P. obscurithorax . Thus, we can suppose that the discovery-dominance trade-off was broken by the linked characteristics that define the ecological dominant status of these species. Also, P. radoszkowskii demonstrates that others strategies could surpass the set of being fast and attack, and thus this is not the best strategy for all. In harsh circumstances each species has its own best strategy.

Highlights

  • The structure of an ant assemblage can be influenced by various factors, the main ones being mutualism, competition, parasitism and predation

  • Competition plays an important role in the structure of the assemblage, since competitive interactions could control the access of different species to resources, determining the coexistence among species within an assemblage

  • We sampled a total of 20 ant species, which belong to 11 genera, distributed into 6 subfamilies: Ectatomminae, Ponerinae, Formicinae, Dolichoderinae, Pseudomyrmicinae and Myrmicinae

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The structure of an ant assemblage can be influenced by various factors, the main ones being mutualism, competition, parasitism and predation. The high competitive potential of each ant species arises from the fact that most of them are omnivorous This increases the competition effect and its importance in structuring ant assemblages (Benson & Harada,1988), which leads ants to exhibit various strategies to obtain food resources (Carroll & Janzen, 1973; Detrain & Deneubourg, 1997). Others exhibit aggressive behaviors which forces their competitors to avoid them (behavioural dominance) (Bestelmeyer, 2000; Davidson, 1998; Fellers, 1987).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call