Abstract
Molecular techniques are revealing increasing numbers of morphologically similar but co-existing cryptic species, challenging the niche theory. To understand the co-existence mechanism, we studied phenologies of morphologically similar species of fig wasps that pollinate the creeping fig (F. pumila) in eastern China. We compared phenologies of fig wasp emergence and host flowering at sites where one or both pollinators were present. At the site where both pollinators were present, we used sticky traps to capture the emerged fig wasps and identified species identity using mitochondrial DNA COI gene. We also genotyped F. pumila individuals of the three sites using polymorphic microsatellites to detect whether the host populations were differentiated. Male F. pumila produced two major crops annually, with figs receptive in spring and summer. A small partial third crop of receptive figs occurred in the autumn, but few of the second crop figs matured at that time. Hence, few pollinators were available to enter third crop figs and they mostly aborted, resulting in two generations of pollinating wasps each year, plus a partial third generation. Receptive figs were produced on male plants in spring and summer, timed to coincide with the release of short-lived adult pollinators from the same individual plants. Most plants were pollinated by a single species. Plants pollinated by Wiebesia sp. 1 released wasps earlier than those pollinated by Wiebesia sp. 3, with little overlap. Plants occupied by different pollinators were not spatially separated, nor genetically distinct. Our findings show that these differences created mismatches with the flight periods of the other Wiebesia species, largely ‘reserving’ individual plants for the resident pollinator species. This pre-emptive competitive displacement may prevent long term co-existence of the two pollinators.
Highlights
Plants and their insect pollinators display numerous examples of coevolution and coadaptation, most obviously in the diversity of floral structures and the various adaptations displayed by insects for obtaining rewards provided by the plants [1]
Flowering Phenology and Fig Wasp Flight Periods Flowering on male trees was broadly synchronized at both the individual tree and population levels, but fig generations overlapped to an extent that allowed pollinator populations to cycle on individual trees
The flowering phenology of male F. pumila, with two or three synchonized annual cropping periods, strongly constrains the life cycles of the two species of pollinator fig wasp that are associated with this fig tree in Eastern China
Summary
Plants and their insect pollinators display numerous examples of coevolution and coadaptation, most obviously in the diversity of floral structures and the various adaptations displayed by insects for obtaining rewards provided by the plants [1]. Molecular markers had revealed the presence of many genetically divergent fig wasp species sharing the same host figs [15,16] Morphological differences between these species are small or absent and they are often referred to as ‘cryptic’ species of pollinating wasps [15,17]. The findings of several cryptic pollinating wasps in a fig tree create a paradox for the ecological competition theory, i.e., coexistence of seemingly identical competitors [18]. Whether those cryptic fig-wasps can coexist has been rarely checked (but see [19]). We suggest that those cryptic pollinating wasps may differentiate in some manners, if the coexistence of cryptic fig wasps is stable
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.