Abstract
Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsCompetitive Collusion: The Preemption of Competition During the Sequential Establishment of TerritoriesThomas GettyThomas Getty Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 118, Number 3Sep., 1981 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283834 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1981 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Tilman Hartley, Baogui Xin The continuing evolution of ownership, PLOS ONE 14, no.22 (Feb 2019): e0211871.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211871Martin Hinsch, Jan Komdeur What do territory owners defend against?, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no.18491849 (Feb 2017): 20162356.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2356Árni Einarsson Viking Age Fences and Early Settlement Dynamics in Iceland, Journal of the North Atlantic 12, no.2727 (Apr 2015): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.3721/037.006.2703Mike Mesterton-Gibbons, Tom N. Sherratt Neighbor intervention: A game-theoretic model, Journal of Theoretical Biology 256, no.22 (Jan 2009): 263–275.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.004Martin Hromada, Marcin Antczak, Thomas J. Valone, Piotr Tryjanowski, Frederick R. Adler Settling Decisions and Heterospecific Social Information Use in Shrikes, PLoS ONE 3, no.1212 (Dec 2008): e3930.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003930 Debora Arlt and Tomas Pärt Sex‐Biased Dispersal: A Result of a Sex Difference in Breeding Site Availability. D. Arlt and T. Pärt, The American Naturalist 171, no.66 (Jul 2015): 844–850.https://doi.org/10.1086/587521Debora Arlt, Tomas Pärt NONIDEAL BREEDING HABITAT SELECTION: A MISMATCH BETWEEN PREFERENCE AND FITNESS, Ecology 88, no.33 (Mar 2007): 792–801.https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0574Alexander M. Mills, James D. Rising, Donald A. Jackson Conspecific attraction during establishment of Least Flycatcher clusters, Journal of Field Ornithology 77, no.11 (Mar 2006): 34–38.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00009.xScott A. Tarof, Laurene M. Ratcliffe, Michael M. Kasumovic, Peter T. Boag Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks?, Behavioral Ecology 16, no.11 (Aug 2004): 207–217.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh155John K. Leiser, Murray Itzkowitz Changing tactics: dominance, territoriality, and the responses of “primary” males to competition from conditional breeders in the variegated pupfish (Cyprinodon variegatus), Behavioural Processes 66, no.22 (May 2004): 119–130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.01.008Scott A. Tarof, Laurene M. Ratcliffe, T. C. Grubb Jr. , The Auk 121, no.33 ( 2004): 877.https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/121.3.877John K. Leiser When are neighbours ‘dear enemies’ and when are they not? The responses of territorial male variegated pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus, to neighbours, strangers and heterospecifics, Animal Behaviour 65, no.33 (Mar 2003): 453–462.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2087Eldridge S. Adams Approaches to the Study of Territory Size and Shape, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, no.11 (Nov 2001): 277–303.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114034Linda S. Rayor, George W. Uetz Age-related sequential web building in the colonial spider Metepeira incrassata (Araneidae): an adaptive spacing strategy, Animal Behaviour 59, no.66 (Jun 2000): 1251–1259.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1427Charles R. Brown, Mary Bomberger Brown Nest spacing in relation to settlement time in colonial cliff swallows, Animal Behaviour 59, no.11 (Jan 2000): 47–55.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1277Peter T. Sherman, Perri K. Eason SIZE DETERMINANTS IN TERRITORIES WITH INFLEXIBLE BOUNDARIES: MANIPULATION EXPERIMENTS ON WHITE-WINGED TRUMPETERS’ TERRITORIES, Ecology 79, no.44 (Jun 1998): 1147–1159.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1147:SDITWI]2.0.CO;2 K. L. Muller , J. A. Stamps , V. V. Krishnan , and N. H. Willits The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes aedon) Muller et al., The American Naturalist 150, no.55 (Jul 2015): 650–661.https://doi.org/10.1086/286087Margaret A. Hodge, Amy Storfer-Isser Conspecific and Heterospecific Attraction: A Mechanism of Web-site Selection Leading to Aggregation Formation by Web-building Spiders, Ethology 103, no.1010 (Apr 2010): 815–826.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00123.xNicholas L. Rodenhouse, Thomas W. Sherry, Richard T. Holmes SITE-DEPENDENT REGULATION OF POPULATION SIZE:A NEW SYNTHESIS, Ecology 78, no.77 (Oct 1997): 2025–2042.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2025:SDROPS]2.0.CO;2William J. Hamilton, John W. McNutt Determinants of Conflict Outcomes, (Jan 1997): 179–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1745-4_7J.A. Stamps, V.V. Krishnan Territory acquisition in lizards: III. Competing for space, Animal Behaviour 49, no.33 (Mar 1995): 679–693.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80201-0Judy Stamps Territorial Behavior: Testing the Assumptions, (Jan 1994): 173–232.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60354-XDave Shutler, Patrick J. Weatherhead Surplus territory contenders in male red-winged blackbirds: where are the desperados?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31, no.22 (Aug 1992): 97–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166342 REFERENCES, (Jan 1991): 637–724.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-092551-6.50026-X Judy A. Stamps , and V. V. Krishnan The Effect of Settlement Tactics on Territory Sizes, The American Naturalist 135, no.44 (Oct 2015): 527–546.https://doi.org/10.1086/285060 J. A. Stamps Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species, The American Naturalist 131, no.33 (Oct 2015): 329–347.https://doi.org/10.1086/284793Micheal V. Studd, Raleigh J. Robertson Evidence for reliable badges of status in territorial yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia), Animal Behaviour 33, no.44 (Nov 1985): 1102–1113.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80169-X
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.