Abstract

Molecular-scale distributions of Sr 2+ and fulvic acid (FA) adsorbed on the muscovite (0 0 1) surface were investigated using in situ specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) and resonant anomalous X-ray reflectivity (RAXR). The total amount of Sr 2+ adsorbed from a 1 × 10 −2 mol/kg SrCl 2 and 100 mg/kg Elliott Soil Fulvic Acid II (ESFA II) solution at pH 5.5 compensated 81 ± 5% of the muscovite surface charge, less than previously measured (118 ± 5%) in an ESFA II-free solution with the same Sr concentration and pH. Inner-sphere (IS) and outer-sphere (OS) Sr 2+ constituted 87% of the total adsorbed species in IS:OS proportions of 19:81 compared to 42:58 in the solution without FA, suggesting that adsorbed FA competes with the IS Sr 2+ for surface sites. The coverage of both IS and OS Sr 2+ decreased even more in a pH 3.5 solution containing the same concentration of FA and 0.5 × 10 −2 mol/kg Sr(NO 3) 2, whereas a significant amount of Sr 2+ accumulated farther from the surface in the FA layer. The amount of Sr 2+ incorporated in the ∼10 Å thick FA layer decreased by 79% with decreasing FA concentration (100 → 1 mg/kg) and increasing Sr 2+ concentration (0.5 × 10 −2 → 1 × 10 −2 mol/kg) and pH (3.5 → 3.6). These results indicate not only that adsorbed FA molecules (and perhaps also H 3O +) displace Sr 2+ near the muscovite surface, but also that the sorbed FA film provides binding sites for additional Sr 2+ away from the surface. When a muscovite crystal pre-coated with FA after reaction in a 100 mg/kg ESFA II solution for 50 h was subsequently reacted with a 0.5 × 10 −2 mol/kg Sr(NO 3) 2 and 100 mg/kg ESFA II solution at pH 3.7, a significant fraction of Sr 2+ was distributed in the outer part of the FA film similar to that observed on fresh muscovite reacted at pH 3.5 with a pre-mixed Sr–FA solution at the same concentrations. However, this Sr 2+ sorbed in the pre-adsorbed organic film was more widely distributed and had a lower coverage, suggesting that pre-sorbed FA may undergo fractionation and/or conformational changes that diminish its capacity, and that of the muscovite (0 0 1) surface, for adsorbing the aqueous Sr cation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call