Abstract

To the Editor. — A recent article by Drs Robinson and Luft 1 shows that the increasein hospital costs per adjusted admission in Massachusetts from 1982 through 1986 was 16.3% lower than that observed in 43 control states. On the basis of these figures, they conclude that Massachusetts was one of the state programs most successful in controlling hospital cost inflation. Unfortunately, this assertion is highly misleading on account of two aspects of their methodology. First, the study looks only at the period during which cost containment was in effect; success in controlling cost inflation is defined as the difference between the rate of increase in costs in Massachusetts and the rise in the country as a whole during this period. However, to assess the impact of the legislation, it is also necessary to consider the rate of increase in costs observed before cost containment was imposed. The

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.