Abstract

Observations on 12 groups comprised of two adult males and one adult female (some included one or two fledglings), tame, individually marked, Arabian babblers ( Turdoides squamiceps) in the rift valley in Israel revealed that the babblers compete to guard. The pattern of guarding and the way by which one sentinel replaces another reflect the dominance relationships within the group. The dominant (alpha) male guarded more than any other individual. It interfered with and replaced the guarding by the adult beta male more than it did with the yearlings. About one-third of the replacements occurred less than one minute after the sentinel had assumed guarding. Whereas the dominant often replaced its subordinates directly; subordinates hardly ever replaced their dominants directly. The alpha male often allofed the beta male during the replacement. Replacements and allofeeding of the beta males by the alpha males increased significantly during courtship, when competition over breeding was maximal, and dropped back to their previous level at the start of incubation, highlighting the competitive basis underlying the act of guarding. Competition over altruistic acts, as shown here for guarding, is not compatible with explanations based on the assumption that altruistic acts reduce the fitness (reproductive success) of the altruist. We suggest, in contrast, that by investing in guarding and by intervening in the guarding of its competitors, a babbler demonstrates and signals its quality and its control over its competitors, thereby increasing its prestige and consequently its direct fitness.

Highlights

  • The issue of altruism is still a major question in evolution. Trivers (1985) defined altruism as an “act that confers a benefit on someone at a cost to the other.” “...cost is measured by a decrease in reproductive success”

  • All these theories are based on the assumption that the altruistic act reduces the reproductive success of the altruist, and were developed in order to explain how altruism has persisted despite its supposed shortcomings

  • In this paper we present data showing that the alpha and beta male babblers compete to perform the altruistic act of guarding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The issue of altruism is still a major question in evolution. Trivers (1985) defined altruism as an “act that confers a benefit on someone at a cost to the other (the altruist).” “...cost is measured by a decrease in reproductive success”. Several theories have been posited to suggest that the altruist gains indirectly, among them are group-selection (including group augmentation), kin-selection and reciprocal-altruism. All these theories are based on the assumption that the altruistic act reduces the reproductive success of the altruist, and were developed in order to explain how altruism has persisted despite its supposed shortcomings. Contestants would be expected to compete to perform the altruistic act. Such competition has already been shown in babblers for allofeeding and feeding at the nest by yearlings (Carlisle & Zahavi, 1986); for mobbing of raptors (Anava, 1992); in confrontations with neighbours (Berger, 2002) and in allofeeding among adults (Kalishov et al, 2005)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call