Abstract

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) and plant competition play an important role in structuring vegetation composition, but their interaction remains unclear. Recent studies suggest that competing plants could dilute pathogenic effects, whereas the standing view is that competition may increase the sensitivity of the focal plant to PSF. In agro-ecosystems each of these two options would yield contrasting outcomes: reduced versus enhanced effects of weeds on crop biomass production. To test the effect of competition on sensitivity to PSF, we grew Triticum aestivum (Common wheat) with and without competition from a weed community composed of Vicia villosa, Chenopodium album and Myosotis arvensis. Plants were grown in sterilized soil, with or without living field inoculum from 4 farms in the UK. In the conditioning phase, field inocula had both positive and negative effects on T. aestivum shoot biomass, depending on farm. In the feedback phase the differences between shoot biomass in T. aestivum monoculture on non-inoculated and inoculated soils had mostly disappeared. However, T. aestivum plants growing in mixtures in the feedback phase were larger on non-inoculated soil than on inoculated soil. Hence, T. aestivum was more sensitive to competition when the field soil biota was present. This was supported by the statistically significant negative correlation between shoot biomass of weeds and T. aestivum, which was absent on sterilized soil. In conclusion, competition in cereal crop-weed systems appears to increase cereal crop sensitivity to soil biota.

Highlights

  • Plants have selective effects on soil biota, with negative, neutral or positive consequences for future occupants of the same location [1,2]

  • Effect of crop-weed mixtures on vulnerability to plant-soil feedback (PSF) In the feedback phase the effect of inoculation interacted with farm and competition

  • The presence of weeds reduced T. aestivum shoot biomass in all cases (Fig. 2A, 2B), but the strength of the effect is modified by farm and inoculation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants have selective effects on soil biota, with negative, neutral or positive consequences for future occupants of the same location [1,2]. These biotic plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects are caused by net effects of soil-borne mutualists and pathogens that develop in the rhizosphere during plant growth [3]. If conspecific plants perform worse in the growing cycle, this is called a negative PSF. The success of later successional plants traditionally has been attributed to their ability to constrain growth of predecessors [12], but more recently it has been acknowledged that species-specific PSF can influence predecessor-successor interactions [1,13,14]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call