Competition in the ‘body without organs’: an assemblage perspective on the UK’s fast train (HS2) cancellation

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this contribution, an investigation is made into the abandonment of a very large infrastructural investment by the UK government. It was the HS2 (High Speed 2) train ‘assemblage’ for the 345 miles from Leeds in the North to London. It occurred in the belief that such expenditure would ‘level-up’ the worsening regional economic disparities between the two regions and render the North (dubbed the ‘Northern Powerhouse’ by successive governments) ‘competitive’. In reality, there was no evidence in support of the idea that a faster rail service would have this effect. Critics realized London’s advantage could not be competed against. This was because its advantage as an unregulated ‘tax haven’ had been entrenched since even before William the Conqueror’s invasion in 1066. Our take on this débâcle is that it was caused by hubris on the part of successive governments, culminating in the growth of distrust between politicians and the people, including ‘experts’ who were singled out for special ministerial disdain. The analysis explores ‘assemblage’ theory and its psychological origins, in which desire has come to substitute for thought in the UK political arena. Accordingly, desire has been swallowed up by ‘competitiveness’, meaning mistakes were made due to hubris, narcissism and criminality because of the politics of ‘we know better’ on the part of the political élite. The cost of these mistakes was upwards of £36 billion for the biggest UK rail infrastructure project in a hundred years.