Abstract

Deciding between different voluntary movements implies a continuous control of the competition between potential actions. Many theories postulate a leading role of prefrontal cortices in this executive function, but strong evidence exists that a motor region like the primary motor cortex (M1) is also involved, possibly via inhibitory mechanisms. This was already shown during the pre-movement decision period, but not after movement onset. For this pilot experiment we designed a new task compatible with the dynamics of post-onset control to study the silent period (SP) duration, a pause in electromyographic activity after single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation that reflects inhibitory mechanisms. A careful analysis of the SP during the ongoing movement indicates a gradual increase in inhibitory mechanisms with the level of competition, consistent with an increase in mutual inhibition between alternative movement options. However, we also observed a decreased SP duration for high-competition trials associated with change-of-mind inflections in their trajectories. Our results suggest a new post-onset adaptive process that consists in a transient reduction of GABAergic inhibition within M1 for highly conflicting situations. We propose that this reduced inhibition softens the competition between concurrent motor options, thereby favoring response vacillation, an adaptive strategy that proved successful at improving behavioral performance.

Highlights

  • Because most decisions are implemented through concrete action, understanding their neuronal bases requires to address eventually the question of competition between potential responses

  • In order to better understand the neuronal bases of voluntary movement and its control, we designed a directional analog of the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935; MacLeod, 1991) allowing (1) to involve complex movements requiring several muscles, (2) to control the level of competition between simultaneous movement options, and (3) to clarify the functional role of inhibitory circuits in competition resolution, more during the ongoing evolution of the decision

  • The combination of cognitive conditions and angular distances provided 12 different types of trials that could be ordered according to a continuum of increasing RT, which would be proportional to the level of competition or task difficulty (Figure 2C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thanks to precise analyses of the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP) that reveal the corticospinal excitability (CSE), they generated a great deal of knowledge about the chronometry and the network organization of the cortical mechanisms involved in conflict These studies strongly suggest that M1 is not just a blind executor of a decision made upstream but is biased and modulated by cognitive influences during the RT period (Michelet et al, 2010; Klein et al, 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call