Abstract

The modulated receptor hypothesis states that sodium channels have a specific receptor for antiarrhythmic drugs. Therefore, two agents that block sodium channels by binding to this receptor are expected to compete for occupancy. Glycylxylidide (GX) is a deethylated metabolite of lidocaine that accumulates in patients on lidocaine therapy. In single, voltage-clamped cardiocytes, GX, like lidocaine, blocked cardiac sodium channels in a use-dependent manner. However, its kinetics of recovery from block were markedly different from lidocaine: at potentials between -80 and -100 mV, GX-blocked channels recovered faster and more completely than lidocaine-blocked channels but recovered more slowly at more negative potentials (-120 to -140 mV). If lidocaine and GX compete for a common receptor, then there are conditions in which addition of a "faster" drug to a "slower" drug will produce less block than the slower drug alone. At potentials between -120 and -140 mV, addition of GX (slower drug) to lidocaine always increased the level of block, but addition of lidocaine to GX decreased the block in four of nine experiments and did not increase it in three of nine experiments. Conversely, at potentials between -80 and -100 mV, addition of lidocaine (slower drug) to GX always increased block, whereas addition of GX to lidocaine reduced the level of block in five of 16 experiments and did not increase it in seven of 16 experiments. Thus, upon addition of more blocker, the sodium current increased in 36% of cases or did not decline in 76% of cases. These results can be explained by the modulated receptor hypothesis with two drugs competing for the same receptor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.