Abstract

Abstract The introduction of a non‐native species frequently has adverse direct effects on native species. The underlying mechanisms, however, often remain unclear, in particular where native and invasive species are taxonomically similar. We found evidence of direct competitive interactions between a globally distributed invasive species (the Pacific oyster, Magallana gigas) and its native counterpart (the European oyster, Ostrea edulis). We also discovered that the competitive outcome differed between different habitat types and orientation by identifying context‐dependent responses driven by environmental conditions and stress (i.e. intertidal compared to subtidal habitats; and vertical versus horizontal substratum). This is particularly important because the European oyster is threatened, or in decline, throughout most of its range, and restoration efforts are underway in many regions. We combined experimental manipulations and stable isotope analysis (SIA) to identify the direct effects of competition and the mechanisms by which the invasive and native species compete. We identified negative effects of the invasive species on the native oyster, but these were limited to the subtidal habitat (lower stress environment) and determined by substratum orientation (habitat structure). Crucially, we found that effects of the invasive species on the native species were not always negative and under certain conditions (e.g. on vertical substrata) were positive. Shifts in isotopic niches of both species when co‐occurring, alongside mixing models, indicate that exploitative competition for food is most likely to underpin niche partitioning between both species. We have identified different foraging strategies under different contexts, and our findings highlight the importance of exploitative competition as a driving mechanism behind the co‐occurrence of two seemingly functionally similar consumers. The combination of experimental manipulations with SIA is a powerful tool, and we illustrate how this approach should be incorporated, into multiple environmental contexts at appropriate scales, to more accurately predict impacts of the spread of invasive species on native communities.

Highlights

  • The accelerating spread of invasive species has a global impact on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, which has a considerable economic cost to society (Pimentel, Zuniga, & Morrison, 2005; Vitousek, 1990)

  • We discovered that the competitive outcome differed between different habitat types and orientation by identifying context‐dependent responses driven by environmental conditions and stress

  • We identified negative effects of the invasive species on the native oyster, but these were limited to the subtidal habitat and determined by substratum orientation

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The accelerating spread of invasive species has a global impact on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, which has a considerable economic cost to society (Pimentel, Zuniga, & Morrison, 2005; Vitousek, 1990). Native competitors have been shown to curb the spread of ecologically closely related invasive species (Levine, Adler, & Yelenik, 2004), but competitive interactions in aquatic systems appear to be weaker and less likely to limit invasion success (Bando, 2006; Papacostas et al, 2017) Abiotic stressors, such as desiccation or shear stress, can enhance the negative impact of invasions when occurring at unprecedented rates or magnitude (Macdougall & Turkington, 2005). Biological interactions are further modified by habitat heterogeneity, which determines the strength of competitive effects based on the ecological niche requirement of invasive and native competitors (Bando, 2006; Bulleri, Bruno, Silliman, & Stachowicz, 2016) It is currently unclear how abiotic stress affects the impacts of invasive species, where native communities include morphologically similar species, or how such interactions may differ between benign and harsh environmental conditions. Many studies have examined the impacts of invasive species, this study tests whether the functional ecology of co‐occurring species determines their interactions and whether this varies under different environmental conditions, which are analogous to high‐ (intertidal) and low‐stress (subtidal) environments

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call