Abstract
Competition theory is the focus of much debate among both neontologists and palaeontologists. This paper explores the expansion of competition theory into macroevolution, since this is the relevant context for palaeobiologists, and challenges the contention that microevolutionary processes are generally inappropriate to the interpretation of macroevolutionary pattern. We show that the term 'interspecific competition' is imprecise, since it conflates processes operating at various hierarchical levels, and recommend a terminological change in accordance with hierarchy theory. Finally, we reassess the rôle of competition and its absence in radiations. Since evolutionary novelties must be fixed at speciation, and speciation occurs in response to habitat destruction rather than the freeing of ecological space, we believe the rôle of competition to be minimal in both radiation and the generation of novelty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
