Abstract
Anglo-American values and methods dominate our understanding of contemporary journalism. European journalism is seen as gradually importing Anglo-American practice, style and form in the twentieth century. The European model of journalism is portrayed as regressive, resistant to giving up the old ways – a model of how not to practice the profession. This article examines the features that distinguish the European model, including the close relationship with the political world, the focus on commentary, interpretation and advocacy and the commitment to ‘literary’ writing. It argues that in spite of the differences in how journalism is practiced in various European countries it is possible to identify a form of journalism, which is more literary, political and intellectual in its approach. The distinctiveness of this approach is being eroded with the incorporation of Anglo-American values and practices into education programmes, the commercialisation of the industry and the process of globalisation. However, the extent of which journalism in Europe is replicating the Anglo-American model is open to question. The European tradition remains firmly entrenched, especially in some countries such as France, Italy and Spain. It is also argued that the European model is becoming more relevant in the attempt of the profession to adjust to the complexities and changes of the information age.
Highlights
Journalism is often described as an Anglo-American invention (Chalaby, 1996; Tunstall, 1977: chapter 1)
The Anglo-American model layouts a view of journalism that is “rarely attained” and is “far removed from what is practiced in newsrooms around the world” leading some to wonder why the profession and academy still consider it useful (Joesphi, 2005: 576)
A growing commitment to the AngloAmerican approach of objective, straightforward and informative reporting may be apparent in the rhetoric of European journalism but it is not reflected in the practice of journalism in many European countries
Summary
Anglo-American values and methods dominate our understanding of contemporary journalism. This article examines the features that distinguish the European model, including the close relationship with the political world, the focus on commentary, interpretation and advocacy and the commitment to ‘literary’ writing It argues that in spite of the differences in how journalism is practiced in various European countries it is possible to identify a form of journalism, which is more literary, political and intellectual in its approach. It is seen as partisan and political, an anathema in a world in which Anglo-American journalism is seen as the best and only way of organising practice While these features do not necessarily constitute a model that applies to ever European country, the similarities in the practice of journalism across the continent do represent an alternative approach to doing journalism. A growing commitment to the AngloAmerican approach of objective, straightforward and informative reporting may be apparent in the rhetoric of European journalism but it is not reflected in the practice of journalism in many European countries
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.