Abstract
Many accounts of justice and migration focus on the spatial exclusion of migrants. This article argues that two modes of exclusion, one spatial and the other social, are of normative interest. It explores the merits and demerits of territorial and social boundary exclusion from the point of view of justice. Territorial exclusion offends against freedoms of movement and association; social boundary exclusion undermines status equality among those subject to the same laws. Explicit awareness that modern states use both modes of exclusion is a prerequisite for clear thinking about migration justice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
