Abstract

Sprouting angiogenesis—the infiltration and extension of endothelial cells from pre-existing blood vessels—helps orchestrate vascular growth and remodeling. It is now agreed that fluid forces, such as laminar shear stress due to unidirectional flow in straight vessel segments, are important regulators of angiogenesis. However, regulation of angiogenesis by the different flow dynamics that arise due to vessel branching, such as impinging flow stagnation at the base of a bifurcating vessel, are not well understood. Here we used a recently developed 3-D microfluidic model to investigate the role of the flow conditions that occur due to vessel bifurcations on endothelial sprouting. We observed that bifurcating fluid flow located at the vessel bifurcation point suppresses the formation of angiogenic sprouts. Similarly, laminar shear stress at a magnitude of ~3 dyn/cm2 applied in the branched vessels downstream of the bifurcation point, inhibited the formation of angiogenic sprouts. In contrast, co-application of ~1 µm/s average transvascular flow across the endothelial monolayer with laminar shear stress induced the formation of angiogenic sprouts. These results suggest that transvascular flow imparts a competing effect against bifurcating fluid flow and laminar shear stress in regulating endothelial sprouting. To our knowledge, these findings are the first report on the stabilizing role of bifurcating fluid flow on endothelial sprouting. These results also demonstrate the importance of local flow dynamics due to branched vessel geometry in determining the location of sprouting angiogenesis.

Highlights

  • Blood vessels comprise a hierarchical network that transports oxygen and nutrients throughout the body [1]

  • Our microfluidic model enables control of transvascular flow (TVF) levels independent of the perfusion rate, thereby enabling us to decouple the effects of TVF on endothelial sprouting from the effects of bifurcating fluid flow (BFF) and laminar shear stress (LSS)

  • When intravascular pressure (IVP) is greater than interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) (IVP > IFP), a 1.5 cm H2O hydrostatic pressure difference (~147 Pa or ~1470 dyn/cm2) results in a TVF of ~1 μm/s oriented from the mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAECs)-lined intravascular region, across the endothelium, and into the interstitial extracellular matrix (ECM) compartment (Figure 2A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blood vessels comprise a hierarchical network that transports oxygen and nutrients throughout the body [1] Expansion of this network occurs by angiogenesis, where endothelial cells (ECs) that line the inner surface of all blood vessels, sprout and branch to support tissue nourishment and growth [2,3]. Emerging research has highlighted the importance of the forces generated by blood flow in potently influencing the angiogenic process. These studies in the in vitro setting have been buoyed largely by the advancements in microfabrication techniques that enable the development of perfusable models that integrate 3-D tissue scaffolds for investigating angiogenesis in response to controlled fluid forces [9,10]. Previous studies have shown the pro-angiogenic role of transvascular flow (TVF) that is driven by a transmural pressure difference between the vasculature and the adjacent interstitium [11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call