Abstract
13 AN AUTHOR IS OBVIOUSLY PLEASED whenever his work receives sustained and thoughtful analysis, especially when that analysis calls the author’s work “interesting,” “imaginative,” and “important.”1 Accordingly, I am grateful that Robert Bauer has taken considerable time and effort to analyze and evaluate my piece on the “electioneering communications” definition in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA).2 But, although he deems the piece worthy of “close attention,” Bauer finds its reasoning flawed. I offer this response because I believe his criticism is premised on a misunderstanding of my main contention.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
