Abstract

result is growing pressure to produce “modern” judicial election campaigns (i.e., campaigns that are driven by the need for money to disseminate more information to a large but often inattentive electorate through increasingly expensive modes of communication). This pressure is likely to continue. While the 1998 campaign for one of Wisconsin’s seats in the United States Senate cost $4 million for the relatively restrained Russell Feingold, the 1999 Wisconsin Supreme Court race cost “only” $1 million for all of the candidates combined. 5 Clearly, spending in statewide judicial races lags behind that of other statewide races. Judicial campaigns are attracting the attention of independent groups or, as

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.