Compatibilization effectiveness of maleated polypropylene compared to organoclay in PBT/PP blends

Abstract

The compatibilization efficiency of a conventional compatibilizer (PP-grafted maleic anhydride) is compared with an organoclay of hydrophilic modifier (Cloisite 30B) in poly(butylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PBT/PP) immiscible polymer blend. Moreover, the effect of PP-grafted maleic anhydride (PP-g-MA) on localization of Cloisite 30B organoclays is investigated, in this research. Accordingly, PBT/PP blends containing PP-g-MA, organoclay and PP-g-MA/organoclay are prepared by melt mixing method. According to morphological analysis, organoclays are more efficient than PP-g-MA in dispersion and distribution of droplets in PBT/PP blend. Additionally, the size of dispersed-droplets in PBT/PP/organoclay nanocomposite is lower than PBT/PP/PP-g-MA/organoclay sample. From X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy illustrations, it is shown that organoclays represent the higher level of intercalation structure in PBT/PP/organoclay compared to PBT/PP/PP-g-MA/organoclay nanocomposite. PBT/PP/Organoclay nanocomposite indicates higher viscosity and elasticity in comparison with PBT/PP/PP-g-MA/organoclay, as well. The present subject can be explained by the role of PP-g-MA in transferring some parts of organoclays from PBT matrix into PP droplets which hinders the break-up of dispersed-droplets. According to non-linear viscoelastic properties, PBT/PP/organoclay sample shows stronger stress overshoots than PBT/PP/PP-g-MA/organoclay in start-up of shear flow. Modified De Kee-Turcotte model is studied to investigate the yield stress and viscoelastic behavior of different samples. PBT/PP/Organoclay nanocomposite shows higher yield stress compared to PBT/PP blend filled by PP-g-MA/organoclay system.