Abstract

Acoustic telemetry is widely used to investigate aquatic animal movement. Pulse position modulation (PPM) is an acoustic telemetry method that allows multiple unique identification codes to be transmitted at a single acoustic frequency, typically in the 69 kHz range. However, because the potential number of unique identification codes (i.e. tags) is ultimately limited by the number of pulses in the PPM signal, this poses a practical limitation. In addition, different manufacturers have developed different approaches to encoding the transmitted data, hampering compatibility across brands. A lack of broad compatibility across telemetry systems restricts users to a single manufacturer and operating system, reduces market competition and limits innovation. As the aquatic animal tracking research community organises towards networks of devices and data, incompatibility becomes more problematic and jeopardizes the unique scientific benefits offered by the networking approach. Here, we make a plea for collaboration among the manufacturers globally and propose a set of open protocols to ensure equipment interoperability as a medium-term solution.

Highlights

  • Acoustic telemetry is widely used to investigate aquatic animal movement

  • Transmission time, power consumption, code collision, frequency use and information transfer clearly differ between Pulse position modulation (PPM) and Binary phase shift keying (BFSK) and technology choice will depend on the environment, species and objectives at stake

  • To optimise the investment and data output, these networks require completely compatible acoustic telemetry systems allowing for flexibility to operate tags and equipment produced by all the equipment manufacturers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acoustic telemetry is widely used to investigate aquatic animal movement. Pulse position modulation (PPM) is an acoustic telemetry method that allows multiple unique identification codes to be transmitted at a single acoustic frequency, typically in the 69 kHz range. Transmission time, power consumption, code collision, frequency use and information transfer clearly differ between PPM and BFSK and technology choice will depend on the environment, species and objectives at stake. To optimise the investment and data output, these networks require completely compatible acoustic telemetry systems allowing for flexibility to operate tags and equipment produced by all the equipment manufacturers.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call